Client Access 
Communications
Bitcoin moved through the July 8 to July 14 period in an environment shaped by a genuine improvement in institutional demand and the return of significant geopolitical tensions. After beginning the week around $62,000, BTC briefly returned to the $64,000 area, benefiting from renewed interest in spot Bitcoin ETFs and a broader improvement in risk appetite. However, these gains could not be fully maintained. The resumption of hostilities between the United States and Iran, accompanied by a sharp increase in oil prices, brought bitcoin back toward $62,000 to $63,000 by the end of the period.
Although the weekly result may appear relatively modest, bitcoin’s behavior remains encouraging. The asset had to absorb several factors that could have triggered a much larger correction: rising oil prices, higher bond yields, weakness in technology markets and persistent concerns about inflation. Despite this environment, BTC remained well above its recent low near $57,000 to $58,000. This resilience suggests that selling pressure has eased and that investors continue to accumulate when prices approach the $60,000 area.
The period began with a slight correction. On July 8, bitcoin fell back toward $62,200 after rebounding during the previous trading sessions. Ethereum was trading around $1,740, while XRP, Solana and several other major cryptocurrencies also declined. This movement revived the debate over whether the market may already have established its low for the current cycle. Some observers remained cautious, but the presence of institutional buyers during periods of weakness provided an increasingly credible argument in favor of stabilization.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs had in fact recorded three consecutive days of net inflows totaling approximately $511 million before the beginning of the period. This improvement represented an important shift after several weeks dominated by outflows. It indicated that some professional investors considered prices around $60,000 attractive enough to begin rebuilding their positions. Flows then became more uneven on July 8 and 9, but the previous week’s overall result nevertheless turned positive, ending a sequence of approximately eight weeks of net withdrawals from bitcoin- and Ethereum-related products.
This reversal remains one of the most constructive developments of the week. ETFs had amplified the decline when investors withdrew capital, but they are now demonstrating that they can once again become a source of demand when prices stabilize. The market has not yet returned to the level of inflows observed during the strongest phases of the cycle, but the simple fact that weekly flows have turned positive reduces the risk of continued institutional selling pressure.
Bitcoin’s reaction during this period also shows that investors appear more willing to buy pullbacks rather than wait for a perfect improvement in the economic environment. This development is important. When the market is dominated by fear, every piece of negative news leads to additional selling. When it begins to rebuild, negative developments instead produce limited corrections that gradually attract new buyers. The behavior observed this week more closely resembles the second scenario.
On July 10, bitcoin recorded its strongest trading session of the period, rising toward $64,000. It traded around $64,300 during the morning, compared with approximately $62,700 the previous day. This increase was accompanied by an improvement in the technology market and some weakening of the U.S. dollar. Ethereum also moved toward $1,800, posting a larger daily gain than bitcoin. Over a seven-day period, BTC was then up approximately 4%, while Ethereum had advanced by a similar amount.
This recovery allowed bitcoin to once again test an important technical area. For several weeks, the region between $64,000 and $66,000 has represented resistance that has been difficult to break on a sustained basis. Each return to this area continues to attract profit-taking and selling from investors who purchased at higher prices. Nevertheless, the market’s ability to approach this level again demonstrates that buyers are no longer entirely on the defensive.
To confirm a stronger recovery, bitcoin will now need to successfully move above this resistance and remain there. A sustained close above $65,000 to $66,000 would significantly improve the short-term structure. It would open the door to a return toward $68,000, followed by the psychological threshold of $70,000. Such a move could also force some bearish investors to buy back their positions, temporarily amplifying the advance.
Conversely, the $60,000 area remains the main support level. As long as BTC remains above this level, the broader structure can be interpreted as a consolidation following the May and June correction. Another decline below $60,000 would not automatically mean that the underlying trend has been lost, but it would increase the risk of a return toward $58,000 and then toward the recent low around $57,000.
The return of tensions between the United States and Iran prevented bitcoin from fully maintaining its gains. Beginning toward the end of the week, concerns surrounding military exchanges and oil transportation through the Strait of Hormuz once again dominated the markets. Oil prices rose sharply on July 13 as investors feared that geopolitical disruptions could fuel another increase in inflation.
Stock markets reacted negatively. The S&P 500 lost approximately 0.8% on July 13, while the Nasdaq declined by about 1.6%. Technology companies and semiconductor manufacturers were particularly affected. Brent crude oil, meanwhile, posted an increase approaching 10% during the session. Bitcoin declined in this environment, but it remained around $62,000 to $63,000, a much more moderate reaction than those observed during certain previous geopolitical episodes.
This resilience does not yet mean that bitcoin is consistently viewed as a safe-haven asset comparable to gold. In the short term, it remains sensitive to risk-reduction movements and overall liquidity conditions. However, its ability to retain most of its rebound while oil prices, bond yields and volatility were rising represents an interesting signal. It shows that underlying demand has become more stable than it was at the beginning of the correction.
The macroeconomic situation nevertheless remains complex. A sustained increase in oil prices could slow the decline in inflation and encourage the Federal Reserve to maintain a restrictive monetary policy. High interest rates increase the returns available on bonds and cash, which can make more volatile assets relatively less attractive. They also increase financing costs for crypto treasury companies and for investors using leverage.
The U.S. data released on July 14 nevertheless gave markets some reason for optimism. Signs of slowing inflation reduced expectations of an imminent rate increase and supported a rebound in bonds, stock futures and bitcoin. This reaction once again illustrates the crypto market’s sensitivity to the monetary policy outlook. If inflation continues to slow despite the recent increase in oil prices, the Federal Reserve could retain greater flexibility, which would generally be favorable for risk assets.
Ethereum experienced a slightly more constructive period than during previous weeks. ETH began the week around $1,700 to $1,750 and briefly moved above $1,790 during the July 10 rebound. It was still trading near $1,780 at the beginning of the following week despite the renewed geopolitical tensions. Ethereum remains weak compared with its previous highs, but it managed to retain a greater portion of its recent gains.
Flows into Ethereum ETFs also showed signs of improvement. After several difficult weeks, these products recorded approximately $84 million in weekly net inflows during the week ending July 10. The amount remains limited relative to the size of the market, but the change in direction is significant. It indicates that ETH’s prolonged weakness is beginning to attract some investors who consider its valuation more appealing.
Ethereum must now move above the $1,800 to $1,850 area to send a more convincing technical signal. A sustained advance above this region could open the way toward $1,950 and then the $2,000 threshold. Conversely, the region between $1,650 and $1,700 remains an important support area. The fact that ETH has recently managed to move away from this region without benefiting from a particularly favorable macroeconomic environment represents an initial sign of improvement.
The fundamental developments surrounding Ethereum also remain positive. The network continues to play a central role in tokenization, decentralized finance, stablecoins and the settlement of financial assets represented on blockchain infrastructure. The market now expects this adoption to translate more clearly into increased activity, higher fees and greater demand for ETH. This transition may take time, but institutional investment in the infrastructure continues to advance.
One of the most important developments of the week specifically involved stablecoins. Circle, the company behind the USDC stablecoin, received final approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to establish a national trust bank in the United States. This authorization will notably allow Circle to offer institutional digital-asset custody services and operate within a more clearly defined federal framework.
Circle’s approval represents an important step in the integration of digital assets into the traditional financial system. The company is not becoming an ordinary commercial bank capable of accepting deposits or offering loans to the public. However, it is obtaining a regulatory status that brings its operations closer to those of major financial institutions supervised at the federal level.
This development is particularly relevant for USDC, whose circulation exceeds $70 billion. Institutional investors, businesses and platforms using stablecoins place considerable importance on reserve quality, asset custody and regulatory supervision. A federal banking structure could therefore strengthen Circle’s credibility and facilitate the use of USDC for payments, settlements and tokenized financial products.
The development of stablecoins remains one of the clearest signs of genuine blockchain adoption. Unlike several assets whose usefulness depends primarily on speculation, stablecoins are already used to transfer capital, settle transactions, provide liquidity and facilitate international payments. Their growth can continue even when bitcoin or Ethereum are going through a period of consolidation.
Competition in this sector is nevertheless becoming more intense. Major financial institutions, payment networks and technology companies are all seeking to develop their own products or infrastructure. This competition could reduce the margins of certain issuers, but it also confirms that the market has become important enough to attract the world’s largest financial companies. Over the long term, stablecoins and tokenized deposits could become one of the main bridges between blockchain networks and traditional finance.
Regulation remains at the center of this transformation. Traditional banks continue to request that yield-bearing stablecoins be subject to requirements comparable to those applying to bank deposits. They are concerned that a significant migration of deposits toward interest-bearing digital products could reduce their ability to finance loans and create a form of parallel banking system. Crypto companies instead argue that these products can improve competition and allow users to receive a portion of the income generated by reserves.
This debate shows that the industry has entered a new phase. Discussions are no longer focused primarily on the legitimacy of stablecoins, but rather on how to integrate them into the financial system without creating excessive risks. This development is fundamentally positive. It demonstrates that digital assets are now sufficiently established to directly influence banking and monetary policy.
The week also drew attention to the risk posed by quantum computing. Several crypto companies and developers are beginning to prepare strategies for replacing current cryptographic systems with solutions that are resistant to quantum computers. The signatures used by bitcoin and several other networks could theoretically become vulnerable if sufficiently powerful quantum computers were developed.
The danger does not appear immediate, but the transition could require several years. Decentralized networks must achieve broad consensus before modifying their signature systems, and users must then move their assets to newly protected addresses. The fact that the industry is beginning to work on this issue well before it becomes critical is relatively reassuring. It demonstrates a willingness to anticipate long-term technological risks rather than wait for an emergency.
For bitcoin, this issue also serves as a reminder that its value depends not only on its scarcity, but also on the security of its network. The required improvements will likely need to be introduced gradually, with considerable caution and testing. A successful transition toward quantum-resistant cryptography could eventually strengthen confidence in bitcoin by demonstrating its ability to evolve without compromising its fundamental principles.
Strategy remained under scrutiny during the week. The company reportedly carried out no bitcoin transactions during the most recent period. Instead, it raised approximately $467 million through common-share sales, bringing its cash reserves to roughly $3 billion. This decision reflects a more cautious approach following concerns surrounding the financing of dividends, debt and the company’s other obligations.
This pause does not necessarily mean that Strategy is abandoning its bitcoin-related strategy. It does, however, show that the company is seeking to strengthen its balance sheet and reduce the risk of being forced to sell assets under unfavorable conditions. From a financial stability perspective, the accumulation of cash can be interpreted positively. It provides an additional margin of safety and allows the company to meet its obligations without depending entirely on a rapid increase in bitcoin’s price.
The market must nevertheless continue to distinguish bitcoin itself from companies that use complex financial structures to obtain exposure to it. Strategy remains extremely sensitive to BTC’s price, but its stock also carries risks related to debt, preferred shares, dilution and the cost of capital. This distinction is becoming more important as crypto treasury companies multiply.
Altcoins delivered generally mixed performance. Solana advanced toward $78 during the July 10 rebound, but remained slightly negative over a seven-day period. XRP held near $1.08 to $1.10, while TRON performed better than several other major cryptocurrencies. The market still does not display the characteristics of a genuine altcoin season. Capital remains concentrated in bitcoin, Ethereum and a small number of projects benefiting from strong liquidity or a clear institutional theme.
This caution is normal during a rebuilding phase. Investors generally return first to bitcoin, then to Ethereum, before increasing their exposure to more speculative assets. For a broader rotation to develop, bitcoin will likely need to stabilize above $65,000 without absorbing all available liquidity. Ethereum will also need to demonstrate stronger relative performance and reclaim the $2,000 level.
In summary, the crypto market is not yet in a fully confirmed upward trend, but it appears stronger than it did at the end of June. Institutional flows have improved, major support levels have held and the industry continues to advance from both regulatory and technological perspectives. The return of geopolitical risks limits short-term enthusiasm, but it also highlights bitcoin’s growing ability to absorb periods of stress without systematically experiencing disorderly liquidations.
Optimism must therefore remain measured, but several signals support a constructive outlook. The market appears to be gradually moving from a correction phase dominated by outflows and fear toward a consolidation phase in which investors are beginning to rebuild their positions. Confirmation will come when bitcoin successfully reclaims and holds the $65,000 to $66,000 area. Until then, the defense of $60,000, the evolution of ETF flows and the geopolitical situation will remain the main factors to monitor.
The presented information is as of July 14th, 2026, unless otherwise indicated and is provided for information purposes only. The information comes from sources that we believe are reliable, but not guaranteed. This statement does not provide financial, legal or tax advice. Rivemont Investments are not responsible for any errors or omissions in the information or for any loss or damage suffered.
