Client Access 
Communications
Bitcoin’s drop back toward the $64,000 area reflects a series of macroeconomic shocks more than a fundamental challenge to its market cycle. After losing roughly half of its value since last autumn’s peak, the cryptocurrency is feeling the combined effects of an environment that has turned hostile to risk assets: renewed trade tensions, persistently tight monetary policy, and a gradual pullback by institutional investors. In this context, the correction looks more like a classic reaction in a market heavily exposed to leverage than a sign of a structural breakdown.
Analysts emphasize that the decline was not triggered by a single event, but by an accumulation of unfavorable factors. Tighter trade policies have reignited global risk aversion, pushing capital toward more traditional safe havens. Despite its occasional portrayal as “digital gold,” Bitcoin continues to behave like a risk asset, highly sensitive to macroeconomic swings. The lack of monetary support, combined with sticky inflation, has intensified this pressure, while increased use of leverage by some participants has amplified the downward moves.
Adding to this is a negative trend in Bitcoin-linked investment products, marked by several consecutive weeks of net outflows and a notable drop in trading volumes. This pullback has also forced certain players, particularly miners, to adjust their positions to protect profitability, which can further increase short-term selling pressure. Nevertheless, these adjustments are generally viewed as adaptive mechanisms rather than signs of lasting fragility.
Looking ahead, near-term prospects remain cautious. Several experts believe the correction could extend and test lower levels, potentially around $55,000, without undermining the broader long-term trajectory. If the historical cycle pattern holds, the current year would represent a phase of consolidation and base-building ahead of a new accumulation cycle over the medium term. In other words, despite the current volatility, the market’s underlying structure would remain intact, consistent with Bitcoin’s behavior in previous cycles.
Recent data suggest that selling pressure on Bitcoin is beginning to ease, even though the market remains heavily influenced by large holders. After a phase marked by substantial BTC transfers to exchanges in early February, these flows have declined sharply, mechanically reducing short-term selling intensity. This easing has occurred as Bitcoin’s price has undergone a steep correction since last autumn’s high, shedding nearly half of its value.
However, the composition of these movements has shifted. While overall exchange deposits are falling, a growing share of transfers now comes from the largest investors, commonly referred to as “whales.” On-chain indicators show that these players account for an unusually high proportion of inflows to exchanges, a signal often interpreted as a continued willingness to sell or, at the very least, to reshuffle positions amid an uncertain market backdrop.
This dynamic fits into a broader trend seen in recent months, during which large amounts of long-held Bitcoin have changed hands. Many analysts view this as a redistribution process, where legacy holdings are gradually absorbed by new participants in successive waves. Although this structural shift weighs on prices in the short term, it does not necessarily point to lasting weakness in the network.
The latest on-chain data also indicate that a significant accumulation phase took place during Bitcoin’s recent pullback. As prices corrected sharply from their autumn peak, a substantial volume of BTC was purchased in the $60,000 to $70,000 range, revealing strong appetite for buying the dip. This suggests that many investors took advantage of the decline to establish positions at levels they considered more attractive.
Specifically, the amount of Bitcoin with an acquisition cost within this range has surged since the start of the year, rising from around one million BTC to more than 1.4 million—an increase of over 40% in just a few weeks. More than 8% of the circulating supply outside exchanges is now concentrated in this price band, creating a dense cluster of holders that could play a key role in shaping future market dynamics.
The decline was also accelerated by Bitcoin’s rapid move through certain thinly traded price zones. The $70,000 to $80,000 range is often described as an “air pocket,” an area with limited historical trading activity. During the latest sell-off, it took only a few days for prices to slice through this zone before encountering stronger buying interest and resistance lower down, where accumulation intensified.
Bitcoin mining difficulty posted a dramatic jump in its latest adjustment, recording the largest absolute increase ever observed. Rising by roughly 15%, it now stands above 144 trillion, reflecting a massive return of computing power to the network. This surge almost completely offsets the sharp decline seen in the previous adjustment, which followed significant weather-related disruptions in the United States.
This automatic adjustment mechanism is designed to keep block production close to a ten-minute average, regardless of how many miners are active. Recently, blocks were being validated much faster than expected, signaling a strong rebound in hashrate—the computing power dedicated to securing the network. Within a few weeks, hashrate climbed from depressed levels back above 1,000 exahashes per second, mechanically triggering a higher difficulty setting.
The rebound followed a major winter storm that had forced many U.S. miners to temporarily shut down operations to relieve pressure on power grids. At its peak, the event is estimated to have removed nearly 200 exahashes per second from the global network, significantly slowing block production. This episode highlights the growing role of miners as flexible participants in the energy system, capable of quickly pausing or resuming activity depending on grid constraints and weather conditions.
As conditions normalized, machines were gradually brought back online, leading to a rapid catch-up in mining difficulty. While the recent increase is striking in absolute terms, it remains smaller, on a percentage basis, than the dramatic spikes seen in Bitcoin’s early years, when the network was smaller and more volatile. It also remains below the all-time difficulty peak reached in late 2025, confirming that this sharp move is primarily a technical adjustment linked to exceptional short-term conditions rather than a structural shift in the mining sector.
Arizona lawmakers are continuing their efforts to establish a public fund dedicated to digital assets. A new bill, SB 1649, has cleared several key hurdles in the state Senate, gaining committee approval before being sent to a full floor vote. The proposal calls for the creation of a strategic reserve funded exclusively with cryptocurrencies seized, confiscated, or voluntarily surrendered to authorities, rather than traditional public funds.
Under the measure, management of the digital portfolio would be entrusted to the state treasurer, with the authority not only to hold these assets, but also to invest or lend them to generate returns, provided doing so does not increase financial risk for Arizona. The assets would be held through qualified custodians or via exchange-traded products approved by relevant regulators. The approach is therefore more structured and tightly regulated than previous attempts.
The bill also stands out for its broad definition of eligible assets. Instead of limiting the reserve to Bitcoin, it would include any cryptocurrency meeting minimum value criteria, as well as specific digital assets such as XRP, Digibyte, stablecoins, and even NFTs. This diversification reflects lawmakers’ intent to build a more flexible reserve capable of evolving alongside the digital asset ecosystem.
The initiative unfolds in a politically sensitive environment. Arizona has already faced multiple vetoes from Governor Katie Hobbs, who rejected similar proposals in recent years, citing the volatility and risks associated with cryptocurrencies. The fate of SB 1649 will therefore depend on whether its reliance on seized assets and its strict management framework are sufficient to address executive concerns, as the bill must still pass the House before reaching the governor’s desk.
The shift has come as Strategy’s enterprise value has fallen relative to its stock price, making it more difficult for the company to increase the amount of Bitcoin it owns per share as it typically would. The metric known as mNAV, or multiple-to-net asset value, has declined broadly for similar firms.
As a result, Strategy’s Bitcoin purchases now stand out even more among its peers. For instance, the company accounted for 93% of all Bitcoin added by publicly traded firms in January, accumulating 40,150 BTC during the period compared with just 3,080 BTC among its competitors.
Strategy has extended its lead using STRC, but it is not the only Bitcoin-buying firm issuing variable-rate preferred shares. The gathering is expected to feature executives from Strive and Metaplanet, which have adopted similar instruments to acquire Bitcoin in recent months.
Positioning by large players in Bitcoin futures on the Chicago exchange suggests a potential shift in market dynamics. According to the latest reports, institutional investors active on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange have significantly reduced their bearish bets in recent weeks. Similar repositioning in the past has preceded notable recovery phases in 2023 and 2025, reviving the possibility of a short- to medium-term rebound.
Data from the Commitment of Traders report published by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission show that non-commercial speculators have moved from a predominantly short exposure to a more neutral, or even slightly long, stance. In other words, hedge funds and other actors typically associated with “smart money” appear to have dialed back their pessimism, with some rapidly increasing long positions. Historically, such shifts have often coincided with the end of the most intense correction phases.
From a technical standpoint, this change is occurring as Bitcoin trades near its 200-week exponential moving average, a level that has frequently acted as a floor during major bear markets. At the same time, momentum indicators such as the weekly relative strength index remain in oversold territory, suggesting that selling pressure may be losing steam. In a confirmed rebound scenario, some analysts believe a move back toward the $85,000 area—aligned with another key moving average—could be possible in the coming months.
A recent analysis based on Bitcoin’s historical price behavior suggests that the odds remain strongly tilted toward appreciation by early 2027. According to network economist Timothy Peterson, a statistical indicator based on the frequency of positive months points to nearly a 90% chance that BTC will be trading higher than current levels within about ten months. Despite the weakness seen since late 2025, this type of historical reading continues to support optimistic scenarios.
The approach relies on examining monthly data from the past two years, during which roughly half of the months ended higher. By extrapolating this pattern, Peterson estimates that an average return of around 80% would be consistent with past cycles, implying a Bitcoin price near $122,000. He stresses, however, that the tool is not meant to forecast a precise price level, but rather to identify potential inflection points in the trend, even in a market that could move sideways for an extended period.
This contrast is all the more striking given the fragile overall sentiment reflected in several recent investor surveys. In other words, while market perception remains cautious or even negative, some statistical models continue to point to a favorable medium-term asymmetry. This disconnect between market psychology and historical data is a recurring feature during transitional phases of Bitcoin’s cycles.
Peterson is not alone in his optimism. Other institutions and analysts maintain elevated targets for 2026, including the firm Bernstein, which outlines a $150,000 scenario, and the bank Wells Fargo, which anticipates substantial capital inflows into risk assets, including Bitcoin. These projections suggest that, despite current volatility, the market may be laying the groundwork for a stronger recovery than prevailing sentiment would imply.
On the Rivemont Crypto fund side, the cash positions built up over recent weeks continue to help limit losses in the current bearish environment.
The presented information is as of February 24th, 2026, unless otherwise indicated and is provided for information purposes only. The information comes from sources that we believe are reliable, but not guaranteed. This statement does not provide financial, legal or tax advice. Rivemont Investments are not responsible for any errors or omissions in the information or for any loss or damage suffered.
